Social Distance of Ethnic Groups: from Proximity to Remoteness (in the Example of Kazakhstan)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52536/3006-807X.2024-1.05Keywords:
nation-building, interethnic relations, ethnic groups, social distance, stereotypical representation, prejudiceAbstract
The ethno-demographic structure of the population of Kazakhstan is characterized by a high degree of ethno-cultural diversity. In the historical retrospective, the analysis of the conflicts involving ethnic groups allows us to discuss the presence of certain social distances that find their expression with categories such as connection and solidarity, remoteness, and intolerance. Over the years of independence, the country has experienced more than 20 intergroup conflicts related to the interethnic sphere. The causes of similar incidents can be attributed to various factors. The main ones are economic inequality, geopolitical instability, cultural gap, stereotypical representation, etc.
The above-mentioned factors, especially stereotypes and prejudice, can be a potential cause-and-effect link in the relationship formation of various degrees of proximity. In this regard, it is worth drawing clear parallels between interethnic attitudes and social distance, which requires a sociological measurement of their interrelation in Kazakh society.
The article represents a systematization of manifestation characteristics of the social distance in the context of interaction between ethnic groups across different regions. The proposed work represents one of the initial attempts in the Kazakh ethno-political literature to study the processes of interethnic relations within the framework of the assessment proximity: from readiness for interethnic marriages to the desire for ethnic isolation.
References
A.Y.Levit (Ed.). (1997). Kul'turologija. XX vek. Slovar' [Cultural studies. XX century. Dictionary]. St. Petersburg: Universitetskaja kniga.
Abdіgali, B., & Ahmedzhanov, A. (2007). Kazak missijasy: (Kazak yltyn zhandandyru tyzhyrymdamasy): [Kazakh mission. (Concept of revival of the Kazakh nation)]. Almaty.
Cheshko, S. (2000). Raspad SSSR: jetnopoliticheskij analiz [The collapse of the USSR: an ethnopolitical analysis] (2 ed.). Moscow: IJeA RAN.
Kadyrzhanov, R. (Ed.). (2020). Kul'turnaja integracija jetnosov v Kazahstane [Cultural integration of ethnic groups of Kazakhstan]. Almaty: IFPR KN MON RK.
Kozgambaeva, G. (2020). Kazak halkyndagy «Zhetі ata» dastyrі [The tradition of "Zheti Ata" in the Kazakh people]. Abaj atyndagy KazYPU-nіn habarshysy, 1(64), 359-366.
Mather, D., Jones, S., & Moats, S. (2017). Improving upon Bogardus: Creating a More Sensitive and Dynamic Social Distance Scale. Survey Practice, 10(4). doi:10.29115/SP-2017-0026
S.Y.Levit (Ed.). (1998). Kul'turologija. XX vek. Jenciklopedija [Cultural studies. XX century. Encyclopedia] (Vol. Vol. 1). St. Petersburg: Universitetskaja kniga.
The population by individual ethnic groups of the Republic of Kazakhstan at the beginning of 2023. (2024, February 5). Retrieved from Bureau of National Statistics of the Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan: https://stat.gov.kz/ru/industries/social-statistics/demography/publications/6373/
The results of the National Population Census of 2021 in the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2024, February 5). Retrieved from Bureau of National Statistics of the Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan: https://stat.gov.kz/ru/national/2021/
Tusini, S. (2022, January 27). A temporal perspective to empirically investigate the concept of social distance. Quality & Quantity, 56, 4421–4435. doi:10.1007/s11135-022-01319-7
Tyszka, K. (2009). “Homo Sovieticus” Two Decades Later. Polish Sociological Review, 168, 507–522. Retrieved January 10, 2024, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41275122
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Kaliyev T., Ashimkhanova D., Mussatayeva F.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.